The issue:

Abu Mohammad al-Julani, the leader of the organization designated by the US as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), had a meeting with Barbara Leaf, the US Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs, in Damascus.

Following their discussion, Leaf announced the US would no longer pursue a $10 million reward for Julani’s capture. This development indicates a potential shift in the US’s approach toward Julani, who has been attempting to present himself as a moderate leader committed to Syria’s economic recovery and has made statements in support of women’s rights, albeit within traditional roles.

However, the comments made by his spokesman appear to reflect a more traditional perspective on women’s roles within society. Julani also reinforced the implementation of Sharia law and indicated that violence could remain a viable option. Despite the meeting’s positive tone, HTS remains on the US foreign terrorist organizations list, which raises questions about potential changes in US policy.

Insights:

Julani has endeavored to present a moderate image while maintaining fundamental jihadist beliefs. Julani’s remarks on women’s roles appear to highlight inconsistencies between his moderate image and his traditional views on gender.

The meeting suggests a willingness on the part of the US to engage with factions in Syria that were previously considered terrorists.

The future use of Syria as a base for terrorist activities remains uncertain, despite assurances from Julani.

Questions raised:

• What prompted the meeting between Barbara Leaf and Abu Mohammad al-Julani ?

It is my understanding that the meeting was part of many attempts to make Julani more accepted in public opinion.

• Following the meeting, what changes did US announced?

It was indicated that the pursuit of a $10 million reward for Julani’s capture would no longer be a priority, suggesting a potential shift in policy toward HTS.

• What might be the implications of Julani’s statements on women’s rights?

While Julani has made statements promoting women’s rights, his spokesman’s comments suggest that these rights would be limited and defined by traditional roles, highlighting a contradiction in his messaging.

Opinion:

After such a worrisome act of justifying immoral policies, I have but 2 words: Twin Towers