Chief Justice John Roberts, often portrayed as the Supreme Court’s neutral “referee,” has faced growing accusations of political bias—particularly in cases involving former President Donald Trump. Critics argue that Roberts, along with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, enabled the unprecedented lawfare against Trump by refusing to intervene in Trump v. New York, allowing the former president to be prosecuted in a politically motivated trial overseen by Judge Juan Merchan, a Democrat-aligned jurist.

Many conservatives believe Roberts abandoned judicial restraint to side with progressive interests, effectively endorsing what they see as a lawfare coup against Trump. This suspicion deepened after Roberts’ controversial 2012 Obamacare decision, where he unexpectedly upheld the Affordable Care Act—shortly after reports surfaced of a mysterious phone call he allegedly received before the ruling. Was it pressure from the intelligence community? Some speculate that Roberts has been compromised ever since, acting as a shield for the Deep State rather than an impartial guardian of the Constitution.

If true, this would mean the highest judicial authority in America has been weaponized to suppress dissent, silence truth, and protect the Washington establishment. With the 2024 election looming, Roberts’ credibility is under scrutiny like never before. Was he always a swamp creature in a black robe? The evidence suggests he may be just another cog in the machine.